Link to PDF: HERE
Lieters comments on the rankings
"The ratings strike me as fairly plausible, though there are some odd results. "http://leiterreports.typepad.com/blog/2007/06/european-scienc.html
Philosopher Gualtiero Piccinini (Missouri/St. Louis) suggests:
I recently spoke with a member of the committee that ranked philosophy journals. He explained the ESF criteria as follows:
Journals that "make the discipline" got an A.Journals with international audiences, authors, and editorial boards got a B.Other European journals got a C.
It appears that many European journals were considered of too marginal interest to be ranked at all.
http://philosophyofbrains.com/2007/06/23/european-journal-rankings-erih.aspx
Thom Brooks comments:
The list is much better than previous incarnations, including certain journals of reputation and high standing excluded before. However, there are a number of oddities that remain.http://the-brooks-blog.blogspot.com/2007/06/best-philosophy-journals.html
No comments:
Post a Comment